ADAPTATEUR ALIMENTATION POUR PC PORTABLE HP/COMPAQ EVO
February 28th, 2008 by admin
INFO D’ARTICLE
PHOTO CONCRETE GALERIE
CARACTERISTIQUES
CONTENU D’EMBALLAGE
PAIEMENT
EXPEDITION
BONNES AFFAIRES
NOTRE BOUTIQUE
NOKIA
iPod
PC PORTABLE
ORDINATEUR
VOITURE
CAMESCOPE
GPS
LED LAMPE
PSP
MICRO
USB LECTEUR OWN SINCERE MEMOIRE
MONTRE
MANETTE
BALANCE
LASER POINTEUR
GALERIE D’ARTICLES
ADAPTATEUR ALIMENTATION 3.5A FORGATHER PC PORTABLE EXISTENT COMPAQ HP
DESCRIPTION
CARACTERISTIQUES TECHNIQUES
CONTENU D’EMBALLAGE
PAIEMENT
JUNKET ET DELAI UNDOUBTED LIVRAISON
BONNES AFFAIRES
65/35 Split How much of U.S. Military is Without Conscience?
If civilian society itself is composed of 65% lemmings who have no conscience whatsoever, and only 35% THINK and have internal morality, HOW MUCH of the U.S. military is immoral? If the citizenry of America were drafted into military service the ratio would be 65% immoral and 35% moral. BUT WE DON'T DO THIS ANYMORE! Today the military is composed of "volunteers". People who WANT TO BE LEMMINGS in a mother/daddy organization. What if the U.S. military ONLY DRAWS FROM THE 65% lemmings segment without a conscience? Clearly, this is the case. We say the ratio in the U.S. military is 99% lemmings who will do anything they are told to include killing innocent civilians as long as some mommy/daddy figure tells them its ok. http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/id485.html Blind Obedience Corporations Without Conscience "The greatest pyramids ... are made not of stone but of people: they are the vast bureaucracies that constitute society's core, and they function not necessarily to get the "job" done but to reward the personal loyalty of those at the bottom to those at the top." - William Langewiesche, The Atlantic, 2001 November Adam Smith's first major work was not "The Wealth of Nations" but a book on ethics: "Theory of Moral Sentiments." As an ethicist he understood that the mechanism of the "invisible hand" would be most efficient if self-interest was restrained by conscience. With remarkable prescience Smith warned that corporations (in his day called joint-stock companies) could slip the restraints of human conscience. In our day this is pretty much what has happened. Corporations have taken on a life of their own, entities without a conscience with the potential to wreak havoc on the societies that have created them. This isn't the place to document the detrimental effects of corporations on society, the political process, the environment, etc. The journalist William Greider does an admirable job of this in his book "One World, Ready or Not - The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism." Here attention will be focused for the moment on one question: What is it about corporations that allows them to slip the restraints of human conscience? William Langewiesche has provided the key to answering this question: "Corporate bureaucracies function not necessarily to get the 'job' done but to reward the personal loyalty of those at the bottom to those at the top." The power to reward loyalty is the currency of the corporation. And this power is also used to command obedience. The subject of obedience to authority will be linked forever to Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments of the 1960's. His conclusions in his own words were: "The results as I observed them in the laboratory are disturbing. They raise the possibility that human nature cannot be counted on to insulate men from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authority. A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do irrespective of the content of the act and without limitations of conscience so long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority. If in this study an anonymous experimenter could successfully command adults to subdue a fifty year old man and force on him painful electric shocks against his protests one can only wonder what government with its vastly greater authority and prestige can command of its subjects." Dr. Thomas Blass's website on Milgram and his work, www.stanleymilgram.com , cites 65 percent as the proportion of people who delivered the maximum shock to their unwilling victims. (The experiments were rigged. The "victims" were in on it and no shocks were actually delivered.) So what about the 35 percent of people who won't subordinate their consciences to authority? Well, consider how an employee rises through the levels of a corporate hierarchy. At each level ability, loyalty and obedience can be rewarded with a promotion. If at any level conscience interferes with loyalty or obedience then the employee likely won't be promoted further. So we have an employee screening process that selects for ability, loyalty and obedience but selects against conscience. As Leo Durocher put it, nice guys finish last. To summarize, corporations slip the bounds of human conscience because of two conditions. The first condition involves human nature. Milgram's obedience experiments empirically show that a substantial proportion of people are willing to subordinate their consciences to authority. The second condition involves corporate nature. Corporations use an employee screening process that selects for ability, loyalty and obedience but selects against conscience.
62 kg and 65 kg Military Press
62 kg and 65 kg Military Press
65 Military Press
Indoman Repping for Buff Delts
65 Confront The Red Ribbon Army 1/2
.
Posted in Laptop magazine |
